The
Drowsy Chaperone would be a different show if it was
just the play within a play. Instead, the show uses the man and his retelling
of the story as part of the play. It is easy to think that the man is not a
part of the play, and that the things he says are not actually his opinion. In
fact, his lines are as much a part of the play as everyone else’s. If we were
only analyzing the play-within-the-play, Hornby’s elements would apply
differently. For one, sequence would be different. The play would go from scene
to scene and move in a much more linear manner. Instead, we have scenes that break
away from the central plot of the play and revolve around the man and his part
of the story. The sequences in this play utilize the role of the man to help
bridge gaps between scenes within the main part of the play. He is as much an integral
part of the play as everyone else.
Another element that
would be different is the tempo. The tension levels in the play would be much
different if the man were not part of the play. The man provides a relief of
tension for what is happening in the play. Martin/McKellar/Lambert/Morrison
use the man in order to change the pace of the show. The play has a pretty
strict tension level which is somewhat broken by the songs. However, it is the
man who is the real reliever of the tension. Also, the man provides a new level
of tension, thus changing the tempo when appropriate. He is able to keep the
story alive and bring the audience back to the world of the play-within-the-play,
thus bringing up the tension level.
No comments:
Post a Comment